Fake crypto portfolio maker: a spreadsheet, a template, or a screen that moves
Three routes produce a portfolio you control, and they fail in three different places. A spreadsheet is fast and looks like a spreadsheet. A template looks right and ages badly. A live screen moves and fixes the layout. Which one survives the shot you are actually making.
Published:
Three routes
All three end with a picture of a portfolio. They differ in what they cost you and where they break.
The spreadsheet
Fastest to make, worst on camera. Gridlines, a header row, a visible cursor, a font nobody chose. It communicates accounting rather than wallet, and that is a category error the viewer makes in the first half second. Fine for working out what the numbers should be. Not the thing to film.
The design template
A frame in a design tool, either drawn or downloaded. It can look exactly right, and for one static image it is often the fastest good answer.
Two costs. Every value is a text layer, so a change to the total means editing the rows, the percentages and anything derived from them, by hand, each time. And it ages silently: the file was accurate the day it was made, the real interface moved on, and nothing tells you when.
The live screen
An interface that renders from values you set. You lose pixel-level control and arbitrary canvas sizes. You gain four things that matter for anything filmed:
- Movement. Prices drift, lists scroll with weight, sheets slide. Impossible to fake in a static frame and read instantly by an audience that could not tell you why.
- Arithmetic. Totals are computed from rows rather than typed, so they cannot disagree.
- Prices that check out. Public market data, so an asset sits at a figure anyone can verify.
- A true export size. Phone resolution, so it drops into a timeline without resizing.
Composing one that holds up
- Quantities first, total second. Decide what somebody holds, let the total follow. Starting from a round total and working backwards produces quantities that look reverse-engineered, because they are.
- Avoid round numbers. Real holdings are the residue of transactions. Nobody owns exactly 10.00 of anything.
- Mix the sizes. One large position, two medium, one small, and possibly one at zero. A flat list reads as generated.
- Let a percentage be negative. A portfolio where everything is up on the same day is a portfolio nobody believes.
Vertical, horizontal, deck
Vertical for anything watched on a phone, which is most of it. Full height, no address bar, native resolution.
Horizontal only when it sits in a slide beside other content. A phone screen in a wide frame leaves two columns of empty space that something will have to fill.
Decks want one number, large, with enough interface around it to say where the number came from. Resist showing the whole screen; the audience is reading a slide, not exploring an app.
What it is not
It is not proof of anything, and the better it looks the more important that sentence becomes. The numbers came from the person showing them to you. Used in a sketch, a tutorial, a demo or a design review, it is a picture. Used beside a request for money, it is the shape of a fraud regardless of intent.
What we make
Flexdger Wallet is the live-screen version: assets and amounts you set, prices from the market, a hardware wallet app layout, exported at phone resolution. You can open the interface without an account.
Questions
Why not just use a spreadsheet?
For your own planning, do. For anything filmed, a spreadsheet reads as a spreadsheet: gridlines, a header row, a cursor. It says accounting, not wallet, and no amount of styling moves it far from that.
What is wrong with a design template?
Nothing, for a single static frame. The cost shows up at the second frame, because every number is a layer you edit by hand, and again months later, when the real interface has changed and the file has not.
Does the total have to match the rows?
Yes, and it is the first thing a careful viewer checks. A total typed independently of its rows is the mistake that unravels the rest of the image, because once someone finds one inconsistency they start looking for others.
How many assets should I show?
Enough that it looks like a position and few enough to read at video size. Four to six is usually right. A single asset reads as a demo; fifteen reads as a screenshot of somebody else.
Vertical or horizontal?
Vertical for anything that will be watched on a phone, which is most things. Horizontal only if it is going into a slide beside other content. Decide before you compose, because recomposing afterwards costs more than it should.
Can it be used as proof?
No. Every number came from whoever made it. Read this as background, not as legal advice.